Invited
Guests/Presenters:
Jim Wachtel, Dickens Associates
David Moore, PFM - Financial Advisor
Charlene Weaver, Financial Services, County of Volusia
Audience Attendance:
Rhonda Orr
Donna de Peyster
Dona DeMarsh
Bob Davis
Sharon Mock
Ann McFall
Valarie Whitney
Gary Brown
Big John, County Councilman
1. CALL TO ORDER
The TDC Board Meeting was
called to order at 9:05 a.m., by Dwight D. Lewis, TDC Board Chairman.
Lori Campbell-Baker noted the following corrections on Meeting Minute's
of July 11, 2001:
1. Statements noted as
made by Chris Travis on Page 6 and 8 were made by Lori Campbell-Baker.
2. In statements made by
Tom Staed on Page 10, the word contagious, should be contiguous.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MR. LEWIS
called for a Motion to approve the July 11, 2001 Minutes as corrected
was made by Jim Bazemore, seconded by Chris Travis. The Motion carried
without objections.
3. PRESENTATION OF
MOTEL/HOTEL ASSOCIATION
Charlene Weaver will tell
us about the finances of the Ocean Center, under Old Business, and
answer questions that were asked by the Hotel/Motel Association. Mr.
Lewis stated he did not have any problems about the questions being
asked in that the TDC is doing the public's business and asking those
questions in public is the right place to do it; there isn't anything to
hide. We need to look at our finances and make sure it balances and is
performed accurately.
MR. HAMILTON
advised he had spoken with Mr. Davis of the Hotel/Motel Association who
indicated there were no additional comments or questions they wished to
make, therefore, this item has been deleted from the Agenda.
4. DISCUSSION WITH
ARCHITECT, JIM WACHTEL, ON DEVELOPMENT OF EXPANSION CONCEPT
I asked Jim Wachtel to
come this morning; we have him under contract with the Ocean Center to
do some other projects here. Jim is our architect and has worked on
several projects and Jim has been around with the concept since the
stressed skin fabric concept was discussed, he's very familiar with it,
so I asked him to come this morning to hear your input, your desire's,
and for him to go back to his shop and come back with four to five
concepts of your liking. I had relayed to him the information discussed
in the Minutes of the last meeting He has the feasibility study and is
aware of those things...Jim, would you like to say a few words and then
get input?
JIM WACHTEL - not having
been here at the last meeting, I didn't have the benefit of the direct
input. Rick did tell me what had been discussed, some of the pros and
cons of each of the concepts that the Johnson Report showed and some of
your own, individual desires. I would like to hear that from your all
and get a flow of discussion...if this doesn't work, it means such and
such, and does that have any bearing on your desires of what you want to
see here as far as use, as far as operations, as far as aesthetics,
anything that's open to discussion. Most of my work is to find out what
the customer needs. I ask that you share with me what you want to see in
this building and what you don't want to see.
MR. LEWIS - we talked
about the campus style and I think there was a consensus that nobody was
really excited about the campus style. So, we looked at expansion and we
talked about expansion for exhibit area's verses the concerts and some
kind of design. There was discussion on expanding this way (pointing
gesture), just to get around to the back, and that expansion alone was
around $14 million. I think we must get back to how much money we have
and can we do anything with the amount of revenues that would be
produced if we did the one site. I'll just throw that out and the rest
of you can comment.
JIM WACHTEL - when you
said that you did not favor the campus concept, was that from having the
patrons walk to the various elements or the amount of land it took up,
why?...
JIM BAZEMORE - well
basically, you don't go to a convention and if it's raining outside or
if it's cold, you have to walk to get to a meeting, I personally
wouldn't like that and I wouldn't go there.
GILLY AGUIAR - at the
last meeting we looked at covered walkways. I think our biggest question
was the consultant in the report stated we have this amount of dollars
we can spend and that's why the report recommended the concept. It was
like we were going backwards...
STUART ARP - we have
difficulty selling this facility because people who have trade show
meeting's...if you have meetings or lunches somewhere else, they lose
the traffic. It's all about traffic. When it's split up, you don't get
people going through the areas they want them to go through. So, that's
why my feeling is the use of a contiguous building to generate more
conventions. Otherwise, if the people who are putting them on, the
people making the money aren't interested, it will sit empty.
JIM BAZEMORE - may I make
this one basic observation: I've been in the hotel business 40 years.
For the first time in my history, when guests come in they want to know
what the rate is and how much is your taxes. My point is, it's nice to
have these good ideas but if people are going to go somewhere else,
please bear in mind this (inaudible)...I went back and checked on the
advertising tax from our operation since it started, was over a million
dollars. That's what I collected to help this project go, and that's why
I'm vitally interested in it. But my point is, don't try to put a straw
on the camel's back because it will break it...because we have
competition and we are not a world unto our own.
LORI CAMPBELL-BAKER - I
thought we had questions on what the consultant had said that Rick was
unable to answer. The architect can put in context whatever we say, but
isn't it the consultant's findings that we really need to research a
little bit? We can put together that we want to change this and this,
but as a consultant, we wanted to know what they were.
MR. LEWIS - I believe the
consultant was more or less directed or confined to the amount of money
we would have and therefore was going to build it or design it in blocks
or phases because of the constraints of the finances. So, again I think
our attempt is to look at it because of those constraints. Maybe that's
the way we have to look at it, I don't know...that's the reason we have
this committee to discuss it.
LORI CAMPELL-BAKER -
(inaudible)
JIM WACHTEL - I don't
know if I would be able to answer them but I could, at least from the
operations of this facility, talk about that. For instance, when we
started looking at the exhibition space expansion and putting it on the
West side, we were spending a lot of money and trying to get the East
side to be the front door of the Ocean Center with a tram way and all
the other work that's going on out there. So now, how do you take the
people from that point to the West by cascading through this building?
Well, physically that's
difficult because we don't have any way to walk from there to there
without going through the auditorium. So, some type of concourse, either
up on this level with the new entrance out in the front, to the back, or
a new enclosed space on one side or the other, presumably, the South
side because the North has the kitchen and that sort of thing. So, an
enclosed first level concourse that people walk from there to the back
or, upon this level with a new entry, to get people up. So we do have to
facilitate the circulation of the people from that front door to this
use area, unless you change the front door. And then it gets into
traffic patterns, how does this relate to Main Street, how does it
relate Atlantic, how does it relate to the River...there are a lot of
questions and ideas that can come up.
So, I'll just throw this
out...the City is spending a lot of money, you're spending a lot of
money, Ocean Walk is spending a lot of money to make this the front door
of Daytona Beach. And I would think that the Ocean Center would want to
have it's front door there. If so, then the only place to expand is here
and you have to get the people back here some way, in a controlled
environment, in a first class space, that ties everything together. Am I
correct?
TOM STAED - is this
hallway here on the second floor, is that the first class space?
MR. HAMILTON - I wouldn't
think it was the first class space. No.
TOM STAED - it's almost
the same size...
JIM WACHTEL - but there's
no connection's from here to the front door, and there's no way to get
up from the front main entry to build into the meeting rooms and the
banquet rooms there, to get up to this space.
MR. HAMILTON - it's not
large enough either.
JIM WACHTEL - ...it's not
large enough for elevators, stairs, or a nice open way to get up. When
you go into a convention center you should see where you're supposed to
go. We don't even have a way to get up here, if there are stairs. But
it's a little convoluted to get too. So, that's what I mean, you must
really do some work on that grand entry to make a grand lobby to bring
you up to a concourse. And then develop this, as we wanted, to circulate
the people back to the exhibition space on a second level, and then come
back down.
And it may be that if the
idea of a campus concept isn't amenable because of walking, that the
ballroom or some of the space goes on a second level, with the
exhibition space down below. The cost ramifications are structured to
hold the ballroom, and the vertical circulation of elevators, escalators
and stairs and just the volume of the space. That's going to take space.
And, you want that to really it to be a bang-upjob and not give the
impression of a half-way done appearance,...you want it nice, but it's
going to be expensive. You want it to be a high impact space. The
exhibition space can be a warehouse. That doesn't need to be expensive
at all. The ballroom can have nice finishes and nice accoutrements, but
it's just a big open space to. But the main lobby has to be a real high
impact area and large enough to really function properly...as a cost
consideration.
LORI CAMPBELL-BAKER -
(inaudible)
JIM WACHTEL - that would
have to be looked at and that's a possibility. I don't know if there
would be a new kitchen or multiple kitchen's. I think the kitchen the
Ocean Center has now is probably in the wrong place, or, a major
expansion factor...that's the main thing. It may be too small also, and
not enough delivery and storage capacity in it's space. That will need
to be looked at to. Once you get past that, I would suspect you would
have one central kitchen and not multiple kitchen's.
FRANK GUMMEY - Jim, my
question and impression is, and it may be all wrong, but I thought that
the area would stay on the West side to enable it to be expanded at some
future point; and, if you were to put exhibit space on the West end,
that would preclude future expansion.
JIM WACHTEL - I'm not
sure if that first statement is correct...I haven't heard that. It's
certain to be expanded, I think. The only thing to be in the way is
Rick's office...
MR. HAMILTON - I haven't
heard that either. Tom, Jim, you were on the original group...was area
expansion ever considered during that time?
JIM BAZEMORE - it was a
compromise and we almost lost it because of the interest rate. We were
trying to give everything to everybody and didn't make it.
TOM STAED - we didn't
have...(inaudible)
STUART ARP - I appreciate
the monies spent here and what you are trying to do, but this concourse
area is very, very expensive to wrap around. Have we looked at the cost
of creating a new entrance, maybe on the South side over here. If so,
you wouldn't have to do this wrap around concourse; and is that expense
the same, more, or cheaper by creating a new entrance there than doing
all of this?
TOM STAED - I think you
will always have to use this back end as an entrance. So, adding to it
another entrance, such as has been described makes sense to me. You can
always have it's use at ticketed events.
MR. HAMILTON - it doesn't
always work with what we have and we have to look to the future. I
agree, and the consultant's did look...as a matter of fact, I think it's
in the Report that they thought that we should gear everything towards
the South. The problem being, and Frank Gummey just brought it up to me,
our parking at Adventure Landing is on the North side. So, if we were to
go in that direction, it would be my opinion that you not only look at
the South, but, you look at the North as well. Maybe you can have a new
lobby entrances where Wild Olive is currently, on both the North and
Side sides. Does that make sense?... Otherwise, if they park in the
current garage, they must walk all the way around the building to get
in.
JIM WACHTEL - in fact
when we started looking at the skin structure, we showed an entrance
there where Auditorium meets Wild Olive, right there, as an entry at
that point, and possibly even closing off Auditorium as it goes further
toward the river. That has been thought of and that's a possibility.
TOM STAED - most
convention halls that I've been to have more than one entrance. There
are entrances to different events, your programs are marked with
directions to the entrances. This is especially true for Las Vegas,
Chicago and Orlando.
JIM BAZEMORE - I've got
to comment from the other day over in Orlando, a lot of senior citizens
simply cannot walk from one exit to another, so they have to be told the
closest entrance to make it in, and make it out.
MR. HAMILTON - Jim, the
other idea that came up was the possibility of lengthening it out on the
East side for ballroom expansion...
JIM WACHTEL - we've got
the space there, obviously. It is the one piece of green space that we
have in Daytona Beach. It is a venue for Rick as far as special events
and opportunities for that. It is an access into the inter-modal
transportation to the tramway... so, right now I think that area is
being utilized. If we have no other land, I think that would probably be
a prime area. I don't think it's big enough to really... you can put
some nice ballrooms out there, but now you're splitting your facility
and maybe you would not get economies of scale by putting a part out
here and a part out here. But that certainly is an option that could be
looked into.
GILLY AGUIAR - one of the
other things that I heard in the last meeting was what would be the
feasibility of going back and retrofitting this building? Because when
we built this it was really a compromise; trying to do ice skating and
concerts and trade shows and so forth. If we were retrofitting, and
granted, taking out the things that generates the most money for
Rick...we only did 4 or 5 concerts last year and the majority our shows
were consumer shows and trade show venue's there. What if we were to
retrofit this building and build phase one, then we would be up around
140,000 square feet. You could take Wild Olive as a part of that, so we
could have good main entrances from both sides, and bring this up to
snuff without really needing a phase three unless we jump...(remaining
comments inaudible)
JIM WACHTEL - when you
talk about bringing this up to snuff, are you talking about exhibition
space?
STUART ARP - getting rid
of the seating area, how much more space could you develop out of that?
TOM STAED - that's the
integral part of this building. I would hate to sacrifice that. There
are more than concerts held in there.
MR. HAMILTON - well, we
have some large assemblies in there. Some of these provide the most
sleeping rooms that need it.
JIM WACHTEL - we don't
have many sporting activities any more, like hockey or basketball. But
it is the only large sporting arena in this area; on the East side or on
the West side. With the performing arts center, there might be no
concerts here in the future.
Well, I think there are
different venues, and yes, this was a one size fits all type of building
originally and it hasn't fit them all very well. So decisions must be
made, or let's move performing arts somewhere else.
TOM STAED - what do we
really lack? It seems to me the first lack is additional exhibit space.
Secondly, and I'm not totally sold on it, is an enlarged place to feed.
The Adam's Mark is handling one that bigger than we presently have, and
there's not a huge demand for...you have to sacrifice. That's the part
that I'd like to see... We might need an exhibit hall that's one story
with a capacity to put a second story on it. You must think that through
very carefully to build a foundation that would carry it and not end up
with.four times the cost.
But, it seems to me what
we really need is first, exhibit space and secondly, a first rate
banquet facility. Obviously, there will be conventions...if we get
enough money we could do both and that would be what I would like to do.
But the money and plans had things about it that I didn't agree with,
and prices I didn't agree with...(inaudible). I think once you decide
what you like, then I think you have to agree to prices more
realistically so you can see...(inaudible). then, you've got the basics
of how do you do it. What I'm concerned about, Jim, is increasing the
hotel tax. I want to say the sales tax increase for schools, I think
that's a critical issue for our community...and that's a half cent.
Then, if you put another half cents on it, it puts us at a very high
level of tax compared to the rest the community...it's a tough decision.
What do we want, what do we need to have...what will get you to the next
level and next level?...
MR. LEWIS - Tom are you
talking about expansion to this building for exhibit space?
TOM STAED - I only know
what something will look like when they build it. I can't even tell by
the plans...but, someway connected to this building. It seems to me that
would put it in to...(inaudible)
MR. LEWIS - I understand
your concerns on the sales tax. I know Seminole County is at 7% and
we're at 6%, and that extra percent runs out this year. But, they're
moving toward reinstating that again, the extra 1%. I think Lake County
is going to add another percent and Orange County is looking at
something. Maybe at our next meeting we should do some research to see
what the surrounding counties are doing. But they are all kind of
changing.
JIM BAZEMORE - Mr.
Chairman, I point out that New York City thought there was no
limit...so, there is a limit...
MR. LEWIS - well I
recently returned from Philadelphia and it was 15% there.
GILLY AGUIAR - back to
what Tom was saying, I've just got back from the Governor's Conference,
they built a brand new facility there. It's all in very close
proximity...we need to be able to feed these people for conferences that
starts at 8 a.m., and are done by 5 p.m. The other things will happen in
hotels across the street...the night time functions, the exhibitor's who
are sponsoring dinners, and that kind of thing. But the proximity to
move people from room to room, they did that real well there.
The walking is very
important too. To save the arena, if the main entrance is in the front
and they have to walk this country mile to get to where they're going, I
don't know if that function really fits us. So, beside the other
entrances...I think the food part to some extent feeds these things. As
far as where do we go to the next level, pretty much what this says, and
we've talked about it, here's the upper tier level in the Orlando
market, the Vegas, the Chicago...but what expanded space will do for us
is put us in that second tier level for conventions up to two or three
thousand people. And we have such capacity; and in Boca Raton, even
though it is a great facility, you can't go back to your hotel room and
sit there and look at the ocean. Even if you are down in their club
space, you still can't look at the ocean. What I'm getting at is this
has to be a facility that can work from 8 to 5...
CHRIS TRAVIS - Rick, your
main goal is exhibit space, right?
MR. HAMILTON - I agree
with everything that Mr. Staed said. That was our original concept when
we came back with the stress skin fabric stretcher and the cost factor
at that point time. Gilley has a good point to, but, we can't afford all
these things; so, it will have to be phased as we go along
CHRIS TRAVIS - but the
main goal is exhibit space?
MR. HAMILTON - yes, the
primary need is exhibit space.
CHRIS TRAVIS - if you
have a home and you want to expand, you either build upstairs or build
in the back. So why not just build to the back? Then, you can have an
entrance East, West, North and South, and label them according to what
the event is. Where you've got the entrances here, you just do an alcove
and still maintain the lobby area structure, so that if you ever want to
build a second level you can do so when you have the money.
MR. HAMILTON - we
can...again, it goes back to the people being exposed and making the
walk. If you don't mind that, then we can do that.
CHRIS TRAVIS - well, if
they came in the North entrance they would be right across from the
garage. It depends on where the event is...if an event is on the West
side of the building, you don't want them to come in on the East side.
That's what we said about transportation. So you would need some service
from the garage to the West entrance.
MR. HAMILTON - but the
people will have to walk from the hotel...across, or to the garage...
CHRIS TRAVIS - but you
still need something from the East side.
MR. LEWIS - Jim, are you
getting some ideas of where we're trying to get too?
JIM WACHTEL - Let me say
one other thing too. I know the main need of the facility is exhibition
space. But, I think what you're also looking at is jumping to the next
level as far as conventions. You want to bring in that next larger group
of people that maybe you can't do right now. And, yes it does take
exhibition space, but it may also take other stuff...break-out rooms,
meeting rooms and pre-function space and eating facilities. So, even if
you spend $10 million to add 100,000 square feet of exhibition space,
but you don't have these other things and you don't make that step up to
the next level of conventions, then you've wasted that money. Because
you've spent it to get this, but you're not getting those larger
conventions. So you may need to spend the $15 or $18 million to add some
break-out rooms, to add the kitchen facilities, now you can bring in
these larger conventions. I think that's one thing the Johnson Report
did express, about the need for the various types of space to get up to
that. I'm sure the Convention Bureau can help us with that.
You want to put all your
money into that which will attract that next level. You don't want to
just have exhibits, you want to get conventions.
JIM BAZEMORE - the bottom
line is you want a Chevrolet, but you want to make sure it's got four
wheels.
STUART ARP - was there
ever any discussion about trying to utilize the Peabody in some sort of
connectivity? Because that's a great facility for general sessions.
MR. HAMILTON - for
assemblies, that's all. But, there again that's 2,500 seats and when
we're doing the church associations and stuff, we run 7 or 8 thousand
people. That's the difference. If you want to stay in that market
segment...
STUART ARP - well it's
underutilized and it's right across the street. I'd try to sell that
too. What I'm getting success with is the new movie theater going up
that will be connected to my hotel, people will be using those during
the day when there's nothing going on in the movie theater, and they
like that because it's right there. I have a little bit more difficulty
getting them to walk outside over here.
JIM BAZEMORE - what's the
capacity of the theater's?
STUART ARP - I think
they're all about 300 and there's 10 of them. Those are good, small,
break-out general session type things.
FRANK GUMMEY - is it
crazy to ask why not build an arena to the West and convert this arena
into an exhibit and ballroom space?
JIM WACHTEL - that would
be more expensive because the exhibition space is probably the least
expensive space that you will build. It's a warehouse. An auditorium has
some lights and seating. We've got that. It costs money...to tear out
the seats and put in cheap space. I think that's sorta the wrong way to
go.
TOM STAED - ...what else
do we need, very specifically. And secondly pricing, to s ee what it
costs...(inaudible)
JIM WACHTEL - you're
going to put 100,000 to 150,000 square feet here, that's a lot of space.
It will have a major impact upon this whole community, epecially, this
side of the community. What does that do to Main Street, Pensuila and
Halifax? Not only for transportation but just physically from people
trying to get around. I think that master planning of that amount of
space and use has to be looked at, and how we want the city to grow and
how we want the city to be functional when this is all over. We don't
want to put something in and all at once have logger-heads all over the
place. So it has to be really planned out.
CHRIS TRAVIS - the one
thing about conventions is that they are self-contained, so they
wouldn't be out on the road all the time. They would be like our special
events, if something is coming that's big, you're going to know when the
people come in and when they're leaving. So in working with the traffic,
people will need help...
GILLY AGUIAR - from
Rick's point of view, it's not a real generator. But, for the community
it's a real generator. I see people on Main Street upgrading their
facilities for people going out at night because you're a walking
distance from all these things we're doing. The impact is going to be to
offset what we are losing. How many of these religious assembly type
conventions did we do last year?
MR. HAMILTON - there we
two larger one's last year.
JIM BAZEMORE - to the
larger respect we want to impact everybody? But why does one vehicle
have to carry the load?...(inaudible)
MR. LEWIS - we'll look at
other means of financing, there'll be several area's. Maybe Sharon (Mock
of the Convention Bureau) would like to give us a penny from her
advertising authority (laughter from the audience). We'll look at all
those avenues...it's something we do need to look at.
I think we've had a
pretty good discussion. Jim, you see what we're trying to do. If anybody
was here for the LSO and saw the traffic out here; what a disaster that
was. I talked with Carey (Smith, Daytona Beach City Manager) to ask for
additional police assistance.
I think we must look at
this along the same lines that's been discussed and we've got to come up
again with maybe some concepts with entrances ways. I think we want to
stay contiguous...we have to get with Rick to see how we go about
getting the concepts drawn up, and then see what we can afford. I guess
they go hand in hand...we will discuss the financing in a minute. But
we've got to know what we're trying to get to and what we've got and
we've got to have some options; maybe some steps along the contiguous
line rather than the campus style.
JIM WACHTEL - we don't
want separate buildings because it's too far to walk, and probably to
expensive.
STUART ARP - I'd like us
to think about a parking lot on the North side...the lot over here that
we use is not ours, we have a 100 year lease with the City. They've
talked about putting a garage there at some point to aid in the
development of Main Street and A1A. If that could be a possibility then
that could mean more to the Ocean Walk, Adventure Landing, overflow
parking garage; and, this could be, maybe, the primary garage for the
Ocean Center.
CHRIS TRAVIS - that is
the only thing that property can be used for, a parking garage, right?
FRANK GUMMEY - yes, we
have the air rights.
GILLY AGUIAR - we haven't
really told him what our target market is. Our focus is not really
into...we need more exhibition space, but we haven't said, what is our
target. In my mind, I thought we could look at the study and what we're
dealing with...to move to that second tier convention level;. because,
we have the best views and the best whatever, so what is our target
market? We can't be everything to everybody. If we've got two big
conventions going in a church, is that worth keeping that segment, When
we might be able to bring in 50 more trade shows. So I think we need to
let them know what our target market is...if we try to be everything to
everybody we're going to end up doing just a little bit more than we can
afford, and very shortly.
CHRIS TRAVIS - from the
business point of view locally, I assume they would want a week's
convention. Maybe the religious groups are going to come out in the
evening verses a two or three day exhibit where people will just come in
and go home.
JIM WACHTEL - I think
there have been studies through the convention and visitors bureau and
with Evelyn Fine's group and with the Johnson Group, as to identifying
the different orbits. Now, as far as making the decision to go after
this market or other markets, that's not the purpose of the study, But,
the study's purpose is to say, here's who they are and here's what it
takes to get those markets. The leadership needs to say, let's get this
kind of space, and the marketing effort can then go after this or that
type of market to get them in.
LORI CAMPBELL-BAKER - is
that in the report...(inaudible)
5. PRESENTATION OF
MAXIMUM BOND FINANCING AVAILABLE WITH CURRENT REVENUE STREAMS
MR. LEWIS introduces
Charlene Weaver, Chief Financial Officer for the County of Volusia
MR. HAMILTON - before you
start, I wish to say they have spent many hours in the last couple of
weeks pulling this information together and I want to thank them.
CHARLENE WEAVER - I' m
not going to spend to much time on this issue, I've got our financial
advisor here and let me introduce him to you... David Moore.
PRESENTATION BY DAVID
MOORE, PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Role with the County is financial
debt-type financial service. Mr. Moore states that his firm has a lot of
experience in this area with consulting services for Orange County for 4
or 5 years and work on these type's of projects throughout the country.
The TDC discussion regarding locations is not unique. The Orange County
Convention Center will be two separate centers connected by at least a
quarter mile walkway, covered and air-conditioned.
Mr. Moore provides and overview of his
presentation hand-out and the objectives of his presentation: to (1)
walk through the financing in place today, (2) talk about what can be
financed without increasing taxes .. (inaudible). And, (3) what an
additional 1% can do. Mr. Moore gave a presentation on the History of
Tourist Development Tax Financing. Several TDC members had questions
regarding existing financing capacity.
6. OLD BUSINESS - FINANCIALS
PRESENTATION BY CHARLENE
WEAVER
Ms. Weaver reported that she and her
staff had worked diligently on the Ocean Centers' financials for the
past week or two. This effort, resulting from the Hotel/Motel
Association's inquiry about the alleged missing $13 million, was
successful and led to the recent meeting with some of the Association
members on August 14, 2001. Ms. Weaver reported the Association's
satisfaction with the financials presented, in which all previous years
were accounted for.
The prepared hand-outs basically recapped
how all the revenues were spent from the beginning in 1977, 1978. Part
of the difficulty is that the County processes the Ocean Center
accounting into 4 separate funds. Revenues go into the tourist tax
development fund and it gets transferred into the other fund where we're
actually expending the monies there. In some cases where money needs to
be issued for operating funds or other expenditures, in other case money
is moved to debt service funds. The summary page depicts all incoming
revenues, the expenditures, and Ocean Center fund balance. Overall, Ms.
Weaver reported, all the money is accounted for. Several questions
followed from the TDC Board:
MR. LEWIS - I know it will take some time
to look these over. If you're not sure about the financials, you need to
ask, because I will be asking also. We all need to be comfortable in
where the money has been spent and that you understand what the balances
are, and that all the money is accounted for. Before we do anything, I
think we need to make sure that this is understood.
MR. HAMILTON - Jim took another letter
yesterday which I will pass out under "new business" and one
of his questions is the increase in administrative services.
MS. WEAVER - administrative services are
allocated back to all the various departments, then allocated back to
the Ocean Center. So, the Ocean Center is paying a portion of staff
salaries, expenses, our budget department and various administrative
services of the debt is allocated back to the Ocean Center. Mr. Lewis
had asked why we had a substantial increase between 1996-97 and 1007-98.
What happened was the new manger at the time created a separate service
center to oversee parks, Ocean Center, port authorities, airports,
beach. Two of those were in the general fund and the other 3 were
separate funds. When the separate Center was created, that was an
additional administrative overhead, and spread out among the 5
departments. So, 30% of the costs associated with that Center, was
allocated to the Ocean Center.
We no longer have that Center, so you
should see another reduction in the fall.
TDC Board Members continue to ask
questions on:
1. 2% collection fees and interest
earned, this is a fee that the tax collector collects for hotel tax. Ms.
Weaver reported this is seseparaterom administrative services.
2. Contract Services costs are determined
by services used by the Ocean Center. The increase in this budget line
item is due primarily to changes from permanent staff to out-source
cocontractabor.
3. Increase in Advertising costs.
Increases are due to cooperative advertising with the Ocean Center
alliance and the money is in contract services now instead of
advertising. It has not been reduced, but it's now in a different line
item. It was suggested that written clarification be provided on
advertising expenses.
4. Events costs are absorbed by people
running the events. It comes back in as a reimbursement under revenues,
under different line items.
5. 1997 cost for events is when a change
occurred from in-house; these expenses are under payroll.
6. Big John commented on savings and
staff reductions realized from Mr. Hamilton's initiative of out-sourcing
contract labor.
7. NEW BUSINESS
No new business was presented by the TDC.
MR. LEWIS - recognized County Council
Member, Ann McFall.
Next TDC Board Meeting is scheduled for 9
a.m., on September 12, 2001. October's meeting is scheduled for 9 a.m.,
on October 16, 2001.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
_______________________________
Celesta Wiley
TDC Board Meeting Minutes Recorder
back to county council home
page